| 12/24/04 |
On this fine Christmas Eve, it is indeed finally beginning to look
a lot like Christmas around here. For two years running now, winter has arrived just prior
to Christmas, and while Bridger Bowls recent 31" dump of the lightest powder
known (2% density, FWIW) doesnt quite match last years 100"+ dump,
its still not too shabby. My sons ski report from yesterday rated the
conditions as "epic", although just bitterly cold. With the temps varying only a
few degrees either way from 0, I can vouch that it was brisk for skinning buffalo also.
Fortunately I only had one to do, which was a nice break from fighting with recalcitrant
web scripts. Until just recently, though, it has been anything but wintry. Weve
often mentioned that it could be September weather, except for the leafless trees imparting that unmistakable winter vibe.
Still, it was awfully hard to complain about, and great weather for outdoor activities
which for us lately have primarily consisted of skinning bison for the Buffalo Bills sideline. Although, I did make it elk
hunting one last time during the two-week extended antlerless elk season. I went up behind
the Wall Creek Game Range, and took quite a hike up into an area known to be a staging
area for elk prior to dropping onto winter habitat on the Game Range. As luck would have
it, the only elk I encountered was a pretty decent bull, especially for the Gravellies,
although not legal game at the moment. The take for the extended season was almost nil, as
the elk were quite happily ensconced in the highest, steepest hideouts in their entire
habitat. FWP officials were completely over the idea of extending it further, and I
dont blame them. So, we joined the ranks of people with a buffalo in the freezer
(actually still hanging in the cooler). So far weve only eaten some tenderloin
filets, and man
They were fantastic! Weve said it before, but if that sounds
good you know where to go.
Besides being nervous about increasing potential for an overkill (Hah! A remote
possibility in my experience), FWPs reluctance to consider further extensions is in
no small part because they had more pressing concerns. And, there are some big doins
going on. At the most recent FWP Commission hearing in Helena, several items of
significance came to fruition. First, the new Elk Management Plan, with some very minor
tweaking, was approved. Overall, I think its a good plan, and lays a flexible
framework that does as good of job as is politically achievable of balancing diverse
interests. It does contain some points that will undoubtedly prove contentious down the
road, and itll be interesting to see how that shakes out. One immediate effect, that
comes as no real surprise is the near-elimination of the Gardiner late hunt to 100 tags
versus 1100 last year and over two thousand a few years back. The situation there is
complex, with many contributing factors, but theres no denying that the most
significant factor is wolves, with grizzlies running a close second. That item did not
receive what I would consider extensive discussion at the Commission hearing, but what
discussion occurred is significant. FWP Region 3 biologist Kurt Alt predicted continued
low calf recruitment in the northern Yellowstone herd, and when asked if herd recovery was
likely within ten years flatly stated "no". However, I take some comfort in his
following comments that once you get away from Yellowstone, virtually all elk
management units are near or at all-time high populations. He seems quite confident that
Montana will be managing our wolves. You may recall for the Yellowstone wolves to be
de-listed from the Endangered Species Act; Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming have to produce
approved management plans. Montana and Idaho have done that, but Wyoming continues a
stalemate. For that matter, after recent disease problems with their feedgrounds resulting
in loss of brucellosis-free status, I think a lot of people involved in these issues here
in Montana are glad we embarked down a different path than the Cowboy state all those
years ago. While de-listing is in limbo, I expect to see a continuance of similar
strategies for wolves who get into livestock trouble as what took place last spring in the
Madison Range when two packs were taken out. I might add that not all the affected
landowners in that area were completely happy with what took place there, and felt it was
a bit of over-reaction, but as Ive speculated before in this column, that took place
right after Wyomings plan was summarily rejected, and I strongly suspect it was in
part a political statement that Montanans need not unduly fear rampaging packs of wolves
proliferating all over the landscape. Still, it was a bad deal for Sun Ranch owner Roger
Lang, who was funding a graduate research student project on wolf/livestock/wildlife
interaction. Not to mention, the wolves were a big draw for his Papoose Creek Lodge
guests, and there had been zero depredation on cattle on the ranch. But when a neighbor
who perhaps doesnt follow quite the same procedures, or just has worse luck lost a
dog and a heifer (as I recall) to wolves, those packs were marked for destruction.
In an additional personal twist on the situation; the Federal Predator Control
Specialist charged with that job is a former outfitter client of ours (he since sold the
operation), and I feel quite confident it's in good hands. He was successful in completing
a very difficult task, which became vastly complicated when a local shot the only
radio-collared wolf in the pack, resulting in obvious complications in locating the
others, but he persevered and actually got the job done in fairly short order. Made for a
very interesting few days, though
So you can see were looking at the situation
from multiple perspectives, and overall, once again, I feel its in good hands.
Also approved, with considerable more discussion, was a bison hunt. Thats an
issue I have keen personal involvement with, and I believe constructive comments were
offered. FWP recommended one to five permits, valid only in areas where there are no
hazing or capture activities present, which means the Eagle Creek area by Gardiner.
Outgoing Commissioner John Brendan pressed for more permits, offering a motion to increase
it to 25, which obviously is still dramatically short of what hed like to see. For
that matter, wed love to see a dramatically expanded bison hunt also, but a couple
of fundamental things have to change first. I might point out that currently, theres
only six bison in that area, so theoretically this hunt could extinct wild bison in
Montana again! The Commission settled on ten permits, with Region 3 Commissioner Tim
Mulligan the only dissenting vote. Tim, wisely I believe, felt the hunt should be
temporarily put on hold until the Schweitzer administration is in office, as three new
Commissioners will be appointed. Besides, there is considerable opposition to this hunt,
and virtually all involved parties feel it needs some tweaking yet. I have called for
formation of a citizens working group to iron out the conflicts in the situation,
which are really quite minimal considering the degree of volatility with this highly
charged situation. Recent discussions with some of the likely dissenters to our plan have
been enormously encouraging, and we feel there is a historic opportunity to produce a
truly win/win situation. How often does that come along?!
So on that encouraging note; Im going to wind this column up with our Christmas
wish for everyone.

|
|