| 6/30/06 |
What I am wondering… is if the dog days of summer
arrive earlier than they used to. Although, as June winds down
here in the Valley
of the Flowers, it’s actually cooled down nicely with a
little shower, the first in nearly two weeks of increasingly
hot temperatures. It produced not squat for moisture, but… The
National Weather Service is saying 50% chance for tonight, although
I’m beginning to wonder. It looks like a pair of fives, to me.
<I was wrong, we got a nice .3”>
As I’m sure they’d happily agree, the Latinos have it right
with the que sera, sera take. What will be, will be.
All the same, I hope we’re not quite done with rain yet.

Things could be a whole lot worse, and dang near
were, except we got a lifesaver rain of 2” after none whatsoever
through half of April and all of May, and then another nice
half inch, which plucked us out of an ugly start. But I suspect
it’s about done. ‘Tis the season.
But I’m OK with that. Mostly. As if it would matter…!
We’re growing some alternative crops, in case
you just showed up here through the massive and so-far-free
intricacy of the World Wide Web. Camelina and Golden Flax, mainly,
although I took up the seed availability slack with some canola,
and finished with lentils. I just couldn’t see any point whatsoever
in planting wheat. Not here, not now, but maybe in a few years
after we have the nitrogen built up again, not to mention organic
certification so one gets something approaching New West prices
for the stuff, in the teens and up. Per bushel. Versus… well
I guess regular stuff is over four bucks now.
woo hoo.
You should see the contrast between the camelina
and canola, though. But hey! Thanks to Al Gore’s fabulous invention
you can!

Now realize, this camelina is very much an experiment.
The only other attempt in southwest Montana, until now, was
a fella down the road who followed (it appears to me) bad advice
and broadcast the stuff in late winter. February or thereabouts.
Although, here’s a virtual tip of the hat for being a pioneer.
It’s a recurring theme in that family.
But the weeds took over, and they nuked it. Disced
it under. I reached the decision to do that to the rest of my
canola yesterday. Bah. Humbug! But it just isn’t worth a crap,
not even near the half stand I judged it at earlier. That’s
the rule of thumb, you know, if you have half a stand you’re
better off than starting over. Canola has failed me on that
standard twice now.
Canola’s touchy stuff. About the second or third year we grew
it up north, we set a near-state record “dryland” yield, of
~2400 pounds/acre. Of course it rained 20” that summer, about
double “normal”. That sixty acres paid my wage for the year!
Although, that was back when living expenses were less than
half of now, but anyway…
But I had one major wreck with it, and a couple
of sorta’ “average” years. Two wrecks now, I guess.
The first, back in about the late eighties; I had 140 acres
that had come up just like Iowa, one of my first real air seeder
alternative crop successes. But then the gophers found it extraordinary
stuff indeed! You could make a salad from canola leaves.
The stuff was just up, a half inch or so high, and in a span
of about three days, the gophers just ate that field. Wheat
can take a certain amount of nibbling, but if canola gets bit
off that’s all she wrote.
It was too late to plant anything else that year.
This was back before anyone had even considered planting lentils
or something to build nitrogen, and just wrote a check instead,
which come to think is still how it works mostly! Those checks
are getting just way bigger, though.
At least Halliburton is doing well.

Anyway, that field essentially wound up double
summerfallowed, until I planted it to winter wheat that fall
before escaping to the Bozone.
It went 80 bushel to the acre, which most certainly set multiple
records, except no one remotely cares to keep track of such
matters out on the gumbo flat below the rimrocks, except for
me and a few neighbors. It was pretty astounding, though. I
remember the neighbors, who hadn’t yet discovered nitrogen,
cut all day to fill a semi. Gads… But obviously double summerfallowing
isn’t practical. Unless the gophers decide you’re going to!
Getting back to my canola/camelina comparison,
though, it’s quite striking.
They both had a tough go of it. We seeded early, mid- to late
April. Seeded into initially good, but then daily dwindling
moisture, with none to follow for about six weeks! The flax
was the first seeded, and came up nice. Still looks good. I’m
kinda tickled with the stuff. It’s plenty tall to harvest, and
has lots of seed pods. A shower would sure help ‘em fill… Besides,
I may bale up the residue and sell it to hippies to build shelter
from. I think I know a pretty good advertising venue…
The camelina, though, came up kind of spotty at
best, especially the second field seeded. We had two different
varieties, so kept things separate. Like I said, it was drying
out by the hour during seeding season, which is most unusual
if not darn near unheard of here in Springhill, Montana. Considering
the stand was kind of sparse, it has filled in amazingly. In
fact, if we’d had maybe one more rain, I’d say the stuff is
thriving! After the rains finally returned this month, quite
a bit more came up, but the late stuff will fizzle, mainly.
As could the lentils I seeded kind of late, but then you just
plow ‘em under, or if they aren’t going to make much if any
seed you just leave it for the elk to eat, and plant right back
into it next spring; perhaps eighty pounds of nitrogen to the
acre ahead of the deal. Or… you can write a check for, what,
sixty bucks per acre or so?! Now you tell me…

This striking difference between species I keep
trying to tell you about is a stark demonstration of the superiority
of genetic diversity, I believe. Canola is highly genetically
engineered. And sure, breeders select for desireable traits
over generations, and it’s pretty established yields will improve.
But you do hit a point of diminishing returns, I believe, when
everything has to be just so for it to work. And in
cases, if you don’t have quite optimal conditions, the stuff
just tanks on you! Farmers find that quite annoying…
In any case, things are most definitely not just so
on the Rockpile Ranch. I’d go into the soil test results, but
then I’d start losing folks for sure, unless I had a supermodel
prancing through my crops! But then Baxter, aka Spud, is not
too bad looking, don’tcha think?

So in this case, I choose to interpret this data
to support my contention that a plant that is basically
a weed is thriving, versus one that would not have naturally
occurred without genetic manipulation bites the dirt, as it
were. In a quite literal sense, once I borrow a disc for an
afternoon.
One can say that this is not a statistically reliable
sampling, although I would counter that for here, for now, the
evidence is conclusive; 100% so. That’s good enough for me.
|
|