| 11/30/06 |
OK, this is as about as close to
live blogging as the Telegraph gets, although I do have a failing
for leaving things down to the wire. Tsk…
But there’s been just so much going
on, that thoughts I might produce this yesterday or even earlier
today turned out to be delusions.
So for starters here, a glimpse of our day might explain why
I have no desire to watch television whatsoever.
Actually, it started last night about 10:30, just as I got home
from a Ranchlands
group meeting in Ennis. The phone rings. Incessantly (in general,
not last night, thankfully). This was a buffalo client I was
scheduled to pick up for, first thing this morning, but alas,
he was in Drummond with logistical complications due to an idler
pulley deciding to fully depreciate on his main serpentine belt.
He was handling it very well, I must say.
I was actually sort of relieved to not be getting up at 5:15,
and after calls this morning to the ranch, et al, we agreed
to let fate take its course. Fortunately it turns out the client
is a capable mechanic.
The complication was I had several other clients showing up
here at Buffalo
Bill’s around noon, and so when I got a call at about 10:00
that my man Rudy was on the road with anticipated arrival out
on the Madison
around that same time you can see that my stress level escalated.
Oh, to be twins...
My main man for assistance on these random pickups was in Helena,
having gotten himself “invited” to several KEY meetings on our
wild bison bill, such as it was. We’ll go there later, though.
I called literally everyone else I could think of who might
even remotely possibly be able to break loose on a Thursday
late morning (a longer list than you would think) and drive
out to the Madison & pick up a recently deceased buffalo
for skinning, quartering, etc. Nada. In something approaching
desperation, I called Cody’s school, where Praise the Lord
they are most understanding about these sorts of dilemmas. So
I only had to neglect several other pressing chores as my sweet
wife was off cell phone-less, blithely Christmas shopping, tear
into town, get Cody from school, run myself home again, and
bid him Godspeed to the harvest pasture.
At least I made it back before any clients arrived, although
not by much, and embarked on skinning several buffalo shortly
thereafter (one more than I’d planned on, wait, make that two).
Met some very interesting people, and sent a few on their way
with some great meat, although the more sensible ones are letting
theirs hang overnight, and the even more sensible a day or two
while they check out this remarkable area’s other offerings.
And then Cody made it back with what had turned into two more,
which were shortly undressed and in the fridge, just before
dark, right on schedule.
Other than that, though, not much went on, except shipping
some robes and skulls, selling a buff or two, and frantically
tending some other inquiries.

Some other people had a fairly stressful day also,
though. Mercy, the stuff that is going on…
As I mentioned, we had a Madison
Ranchlands Group meeting in Ennis last night. So this is
the first unofficial report, although kudos to the young man
from the Sun Ranch (ack, I must check the minutes, I should
know his name by now, tsk…) who volunteered to take minutes.
This was the “end of hunting season” meeting, pretty dang interesting,
and thankfully far less acrimonious than I had feared, considering
FWP is not offering any season extensions. None around here,
at least, that I know of.
The group had negotiated a plan for public access to elk (cows,
mostly) on private lands. We had a one-day call-in reservation
thing back in September, sort of minimally announced but were
absolutely besieged with calls, i.e. took forty more than planned
on (100 was the agreed-upon number) due to a voice-mail foulup,
in something like a half hour!
The participating ranches (the Sun Ranch, Jumping Horse, Cedar
Creek, and Jon Fossel) took around twenty names each. Most if
not all participating places called the lucky hunters, to watch
for a heads-up and come shoot a cow elk. At least in the Sun
Ranch case, though, NOT ONE of the people actually managed to
show. Tsk…
So as usual, the ranches allowed folks they knew, or people
who just happened to be at the right place at the right time,
to come on and have a crack at it. Successfully, in most cases.
Now I am most certainly not a stenographer, or even a competent
minutes-taker, as my handwriting gets worse daily. It’s hereditary,
although I think mine has surpassed my mother’s in unreadability,
may she rest in peace. Disregarding minor errors, though, it
went as follows;
Off the list of 100 names, roughly fifty had opportunities at
elk. The Jumping Horse allowed 41 hunters (not all off the list,
as is the case with the others), who took 27 cows. On the Cedar
Creek Ranch, 17 “known” (friends, employees, etc.) took 12 cows,
and 46 general public took 37, mostly the last week. On Moonlight
Basin, (my notes are gibberish, but to my recollection…) two
public hunters both took bulls. On the Sun Ranch, 30-40 cows
were taken by public hunters. Again, in that case none
off the call-in list.
So you tell me; is that enough access to be considered “fair
and equitable”, in order to qualify for season extensions or
damage hunts?
Not according to FWP, it’s not.
I have some problems with that, as I brought up last night.
I admit, my perspective is different than most. As in, up around
nine or ten thousand feet, in some cases! That’s where the elk
were. The ones I hunt, anyway.

Oh, there’s big herds of thousands down
on the flats. That’s the problem. What do you do to harvest,
or at least re-distribute some of those?! The wisdom used to
run that if you let people hunt them it’d push ‘em back up onto
the Forest.
Guess again.
We had quite a bit of discussion about that last night. These
big herds of cow elk (and the odd little bull) live down on
the flats pretty much year-round anymore. Alfalfa, some say.
In spite of perceptions by some that they’re “unhunted”, in
fact that’s not the case. There are random sections of State
ground, and you get truckloads of (forgive me if I go a
bit judgemental) morons driving around, flock-shooting
at these big herds of elk off the roads. So the elk run a mile
or three down to the airport, where the scene repeats, and then
down to Cameron, repeat. Daily.
It’s ugly. Wounded elk all over, and just the worst sort of
hunter “behavior” imaginable. But do you think the elk go back
up on the mountains?
In a way, that’s kind of “dead to me”, though. We’re
way up in there, because you know, it’s only the blindly lucky
morons (which exist in surprising numbers) who run into big
bulls down along the roads like that. That makes farming
look like a sure thing.
So we’re up there approaching the top of the range, and the
bulls are even higher than that! Above the goats, the
bios tell me. When it snows early on, and then not again to
speak of, and in fact turns to bluebird weather, or at least
blue grouse weather, until the last day of hunting season when
it finally snows (three years in a row now!!), hunting
trophy elk in the crunchy snow, in the north deadfall, at the
tops of the mountains…
It just about can’t be done.

Now I’m not whimpering too much. We could have shot
lots of elk. Cows and little bulls, up at 9000’+, with no snow
for retrieval lubrication. You talk about a fool’s errand…
So we held off, and to my considerable chagrin, this is the
first year in a LONG time that we didn’t kill an elk. Oh, well.
We’ll get a buffalo,
and would have anyway.
In my case, though, I think this five-week season is ridiculous!
At least since global warming arrived, it is. We could hunt
elk from September 1 to at least December 15, and maybe New
Years and not approach an over-harvest. We’d stimulate
the economy, perhaps put a dent in these burgeoning populations
(not that I think we have too many elk, by any means…), and
maybe I’d finally get a crack at Mr. Big, up where
they seem to hang. Or even down where a guy my age, albeit with
horses and not afraid to hike, might get to one. Assuming it
snows enough that you couldn’t cross the range in tenny runners!!
But no... that idea gets a chilly reception from FWP. Because
this five-week season is kicking open the door to allow public
access to elk on private lands. And you know what, it is...
Right here in Springhill, ranches where there’s been no public
access since we’ve lived here (starting in the late 70’s) things
are changing.

But they’re all documenting how much
access they’re allowing. And if these fabled extensions and
such don’t come to pass, well… Let’s just say it won’t pass
unnoticed.
The way the elk plan is written, the wording for qualification
for damage hunts is SO strict that no one could qualify unless
they basically allow unfettered public access thoughout the
season, to every square inch of their property, with no restrictions
as to sex or anything else. Of course, FWP says these matters
would be enforced on a case by case basis.
I’m sorry. That’s bullshit.
We (the
Gallatin Wildlife Association) had a board meeting the other
morning, and our suggestion is that FWP define what number of
hunters constitutes “fair and equitable” public access. If those
numbers pass muster, then administer a computerized drawing.
Now that strikes me as fair and equitable. Recent experience
would indicate not that many will show, but I am open to being
proven wrong.
We voted on another matter or two, also.
We’d gotten a sponsor for our bison bill. I’m not going to say
a whole lot about this, as it’s beyond “sensitive”, although
maybe that’s pointless. We started with basically what we began
with last time, putting management of wild bison in Montana
under FWP to be managed as “valued native wildlife”, with the
Dept. of Livestock handling private property complaints from
affected landowners or stockmen, which in point of fact are
near-nonexistent over huge areas of overwhelmingly public lands,
that would be perfect for buffalo! OK, what’s not to like?
That was one point my cohort Glenn was able to make at high-level
meetings today, is that NO ONE has ever refuted the basic tenets
of our proposals. NO ONE! It’s just politically inconvenient
for various reasons.
When what we had submitted was drafted, though, after consultations
with FWP and others, it had (sorry, but I don't pull punches
at this hour) wimped out to the point that as a Board we voted
not only to no longer support it, but to actively oppose it.
But now it’s gone away. The sponsor perhaps wisely thought better.
Perhaps the Grievance Merchants have some intimidated,
but man… That’s a foreign concept to me. The ONLY possible reason
I can see, is to let the radicals flame themselves out first,
and then use this as a national springboard in ’08.
Maybe things aren’t quite ready just yet. Or maybe
they are.
Things seldom progress as predicted, I know that. Mysterious
ways, indeed…
|
|