| 9/27/03 |
The local Fish, Wildlife, and Parks staff graciously granted several of us
an opportunity to weigh in on the upcoming public bison hunt, to take place north of
Yellowstone Park. That hunt was authorized by the Legislature last winter, although there
are still lots of details to be sorted out. Were glad to see that, because
were concerned that the bill as written sets us (the State of MT, and hunters in
general) up for another publicity debacle like happened with the last
incarnation of this "hunt", when DOL (Dept. of Livestock) was having
shooters execute bison on the roadsides, with TV crews and protesters having a media field
day. Wed like to see this bison hunt take place, although our vision differs
significantly from DOLs, and if this were to evolve into another ill-conceived PR
black eye, well, I suppose some of us ostensibly conservative hunters will be down there
protesting right alongside the allegedly more sensitive types!Fortunately, it appears
that shouldnt be necessary. We have assurance that bison leaving Yellowstone will be
allowed to migrate into the zones outside the Park that have already been set aside for
their use; where they are supposed to be afforded some degree of tolerance. For those
unfamiliar with this issue, the primary reason for this controversy is that a percentage
of the bison (more or less, depending on who you talk to) carry brucellosis. Thats a
serious disease, no doubt. Its most prevalent effect is causing cattle to abort, but
it can be transmitted to many other species, including humans, where its known as
undulant fever. If the state were to lose its official Brucellosis-free status, that would
be a severe blow to the cattle industry. Were not insensitive to that, but given the
extremely low numbers of cattle in the areas around the Park, we think the issue could
easily be mitigated by simply delaying turning cattle out until say, July 1, when the
bison calving period is well over. Besides, the majority of those cattle are grazing
public land, where we feel native wildlife should be given priority. Several of the
grazing allotments around the Park have been retired recently, and others are likely to.
Legislation is in the works to provide a substantial cash incentive for permittees to
retire their grazing allotments. Were talking about a miniscule number of cattle,
and the economic benefits of having free-ranging bison over even a relatively limited area
of southwest MT would vastly outweigh running those few head of cows. And for friends of
mine in the cattle business, yeah, I know the prices are good right now. How long has
it been since that was the case, though
.?
Even though wed like to eventually see bison allowed to migrate into the upper
Madison, and to the State-owned Wildlife Management Areas like Dome Mountain, north of
Gardiner, in the short term it doesnt look like that will happen. The brucellosis
issue involves a host of State and Federal Agencies. While the Interagency Bison
Management Plans mandate of maintaining
"temporal and spatial separation" of bison and cattle could be quite easily
accomplished, there are some significant political power struggles taking place behind the
scenes, not to mention that a simple, common-sense solution could put a lot of agency
folks out of work. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), the primary
Federal oversight agency for this issue, seems committed to eliminating brucellosis from
the greater Yellowstone area. Since its also carried by a host of other species
great and small, I really dont see how that is achievable. We attended a meeting in
Gardiner last winter sponsored by the Bear Creek Council, where Yellowstones chief
biologist gave a presentation on work so far toward developing a means of delivering a
vaccine. Im sure hes an intelligent, and seems to be a nice, guy. Hes in
a bad spot, since higher powers are mandating that he implement the impossible, but his
presentation was laughable. Theyre using air guns to deliver vaccine pellets, and he
admitted they have no real way of knowing which bison have already been vaccinated and
which havent, and even disregarding that, the effectiveness of the vaccine is quite
low. Theres ongoing research on bison contraceptives and dozens of other erstwhile
boondoggles, and from this laymans standpoint, its just not going to get
resolved anytime soon.
FWP agrees, it appears. Their efforts are going toward re-establishing brucellosis-free
populations of bison in areas away from Yellowstone. Theyve converted a former game
farm north of Gardiner into a quarantine facility. This is no overnight project, either.
The brucella bacterium can apparently go dormant for quite some time, and it will require
three years of quarantine before bison can be certified disease-free. Theyll spend
probably the first year of that at the Gardiner facility, and then be transferred to
another (or series of) intermediate facilities elsewhere in the state. Eventually, those
bison will be re-introduced, presumably in areas like the Missouri Breaks as well as some
Indian Reservations.
So, eventually, we will have herds of free-ranging wild bison on public lands in
Montana. For the moment, though, that is only going to occur in a very limited fashion
just outside Yellowstone. The proposed public hunt wont take place until the fall
and winter of 04-05, at the earliest, as it has to go through the whole chain
of Environmental Assessments, public comment periods, and
commission approval by FWP and DOL. It sounds like the number of permits is not going to
be just too great. Unofficially, maybe ten or so bull permits for the fall, (Sept.-Dec.).
Then a somewhat greater number of either-sex permits during the winter months. Still,
were likely looking at less than 50 permits, and they dont really expect all
permit holders to successfully harvest a buffalo. I suppose not, although given my
experience with bison hunts on private land, Id think you should be able to get one!
The potential problem is that bison numbers in Yellowstone are getting way up there
again, reportedly in the 4500 range. When numbers exceed 3000, DOL can slaughter bison
that leave the Park without even testing for brucellosis. We are way overdue for a
severe winter. Should it occur, bison will be leaving the Park in droves, with predictable
consequences.
I know Ive harped on this bison issue before, and perhaps some readers are
getting sick of it! What brought it to mind was a discussion last evening about the
benefits of wild meat. Now I am not just anti-beef. I like a good beefsteak from time to
time, and the ones you get at places like the Land of Magic in Logan, or Sir Scotts
Oasis in Manhattan, not to mention a host of other steakhouses, are great! Sometimes,
though
. We were in Livingston, and stopped for a bite at a roadhouse that shall
remain anonymous. It was crowded, & obviously popular. Had a lot of reasonably priced
items on the menu, and Im sure theyre great. We had a prime rib special,
though, and Im telling you, it was just nasty! Sort of rubbery, bland, and fatty. By
the time it was getting cooled down, it was downright vile, and left you with that
unmistakable feeling that you were consuming something that just isnt very good for
you! It gave me flashbacks to my childhood. Beef was the staple food around our house, and
my parents (God love em, and may they RIP) actually liked fatty beef! It gave me the
heebie-jeebies from the earliest age. My Dad cut our meat, and was prone to leaving a
substantial frame of fat around the steaks, which I suppose was sort of the norm in those
days. Still, theyd sit there and eat that pure fat with apparent relish. Gack! Still
makes me shudder just to think about!!
Around our house wild game is the staple protein source (elk, primarily, along with an
assortment of other species). We love it, and even our kids regularly comment about how good it is. Your body just tells you that
youre putting something healthy in the fuel tank. A few years back a good friend and
rabid beef enthusiast made a comment to my wife regarding our diet that still just amuses
us intensely. Our economic lot had taken a bit of an upturn (although it was nowhere near
as dire as she apparently thought), and she made a comment to the effect of "now
youll be able to afford beef!" We laughed till we cried
.
So anyway, heres luck to the folks heading afield in search of wild meat this
fall. I know; the meat can almost be viewed as a side benefit, as the other mental and
physical benefits are near incalculable. And besides, if you consider the investment on a
price per pound basis, its probably no bargain for a lot of folks. Well worth it,
though, IMO. If your opportunity to harvest some venison is limited, or Lady Luck is
having a PMS day when youre afield, remember we have those bison
hunts available on private land, where youll get a freezer full of delicious,
low-fat, all natural grass fed buffalo. The price/lb on those is downright reasonable. As
my ads say, "Price competitive with beef, better for you, and a heck of a lot more
fun!"
As an aside, weve already got fresh meat in the freezer, as my son successfully harvested a bighorn ewe last weekend. Next up is antelope, then
elk, and deer, and birds and fish, and Man! It feels like the proverbial horn of plenty.
Life is good
.
|
|