| 9/20/02 |
September is ripping by in an alarming fashion. While not tied up in the
endless quagmire that is Dell Tech Support, booking trips, and attending meetings,
weve been on a couple of packtrips in the Madison Range, ostensibly bowhunting elk.
Like most of my bowhunts, they closely resembled hiking and scouting trips. Weve
gotten into lots of elk, but getting into bow range has been another matter. A couple of
guys I know have arrowed very good bulls, but my personal bowhunting mojo needs,
well
. Mojo. Not to complain. Last Saturday my son and I were eating lunch on a
high divide, with incredible views of the surrounding peaks and canyons. My son said
"you know, theres nothing Id rather be doing right now!" I think
anybody with teenagers would agree that moments like that are truly priceless. Anyway,
Ive had numerous topic ideas for this column floating around, although they
hadnt really gelled. I figured it would be kind of a "random thoughts"
column, but now that its done I see it took on a life of its own, as usual.
First, Id like to commend a fellow board member of the Gallatin Wildlife
Association for being featured in an article
in the September Field & Stream Magazine, The article is titled "The Great
Gutkoski", and is about Joe Gutkoski, who is truly an inspiration to us all. I highly
recommend checking out that article.
Joe is an amazing guy; hes 75 years old but still doing things that put people half
his age to shame. Hes very politically active in conservation issues, and a couple
of days back, on a ride together to a meeting with representatives of the Forest Service
and BLM regarding concerns our group has with some grazing allotments on sensitive species
habitat in southwest MT, he was telling me hed just returned from yet another
backpack trip. This was no stroll in the park, hed climbed 5000 vertical feet from
the Gallatin River to the top of Mount Jumbo in the Spanish Peaks. Thats all
off-trail, incidentally, and as usual, it was a solo venture. That trip was by no means
unusual, in fact hes up there again right now, lurking around with bow in hand
looking for a big bull elk.
Joe is involved in a bunch of wildlife and habitat issues, and has been for a long
time, but his pet project is the "Big Open", involving restoring native species
to a broad swath of country in eastern Montana, roughly centered on the Missouri Breaks.
Actually, pretty much all the native species are already well represented there, with the
exception of bison (although there are a few herds of privately owned bison). This is not
a new idea. It was originally hatched by a rancher in the area (a visionary who could see
his way of life coming to an end). His idea was more or less appropriated by the Poppers,
a husband and wife team of professors from Rutgers University. This all took place perhaps
fifteen years back, and the idea was roundly mocked as being a ludicrous proposal.
At that point it was an idea ahead of its time, but in the short span of fifteen years,
it is not only making more sense; its actually coming to pass on its own (well, with
some help). Traditional agriculture (whatever that is, I should probably say modern
agriculture) is on its last gasp in that country. Not only are we about twenty years into
a severe drought, but commodity prices have also been in the tank for roughly that long.
Farming and ranching, at least in marginal country like the Breaks, just isnt
working anymore, folks. Most operators in that country are getting up in years, their kids
want no part of a subsistence lifestyle, and they are basically staring over the
precipice.
Under the proposal Joe is pushing, area landowners would form a sort of cooperative,
with shares based on their acreage. Bison would be restored to the whole area, where they
would undoubtedly thrive. After all, the Big Open was one of the last strongholds of the
bison when they were facing extinction in the late 1800s. In fact, its where
William Hornady collected his specimens for display in the Smithsonian, which
incidentally, have been restored and are now on display at the Agricultural Museum in Fort
Benton (no small irony there). At any rate, area landowners would then share the proceeds
from hunting and eco-tourism based on the amount of shares in the cooperative. This would
allow them to retain ownership of their land, and would likely produce more revenue than
cattle ranching. Actually, that wouldnt take much since most ranchers profit
and loss statements are in the red anyway.
All involved admit what this project really needs is for someone like a Ted Turner to
come in and buy a large ranch, and revert it to bison and native species like hes
done with his properties in southwest MT and other western states. I know, a lot of people
hate Ted Turner with a passion, and I am not a universal admirer of everything he does
either, but I am a big fan of his bison ranching and general land use policies. And yes,
perhaps I have a vested interest, since we derive pretty reasonable income from booking bison hunts on his lands. But, in a nutshell, that is a key
component of the Big Open proposal. It needs to produce income to work. No one, or least
not many people involved, wish to see the area turned into a National Park. The idea is to
keep the landowners on the land, while simultaneously restoring wildlife and bringing the
habitat back to a climax situation.
One group that has recently become involved is the World Wildlife Federation. They
certainly have the funds to further the situation. As usual, politics come into play,
though. They are anti-hunting, and are pretty much keeping the American Buffalo Foundation
(Joes group) and other Big Open proponents at arms length, both because of the
hunting aspect and also baggage associated with past conflicts with the Montana
Stockgrowers Association. The Stockgrowers are a political force to be reckoned with in
Montana, and go ballistic at any mention of bison. But, the Anaconda Mining Company used
to run this state too, and look what happened to them! I see definite parallels between
the two entities.
Hunting is certainly not the only, or even primary focus of the Big Open proponents.
Eco-tourism could provide substantial revenue. But again, its going to take revenue
to make the Big Open proposal work. Just based on my own experience; I think eco-tourism
has greater potential than hunting for income, too. But, that has not been our experience
to date with Cowboy Heaven Consulting. In fact, Id estimate hunting produces three
to four times the revenue of our general tourism offerings. Hunters are not all slobbering
rednecks, you know, and they are not afraid to spend money. Groups like the World Wildlife
Federation might not want hunters to be part of the Big Open proposal, but without them,
as the saying goes; "show me the money".
Anyway, Ill get off my soapbox, but Ill confidently stick my neck out and
predict that within ten years some variation of the Big Open proposal will be in place.
Bison are perfectly adapted to this country, and will not only survive, but thrive under
its harsh conditions. Not only that, they are the cornerstone species in an ecosystem that
supports a host of other animals, small and large. |
|