|
Back Philosophy Thanksgiving Buck Montana Elk Hunting Review Winter Scouting Upland Birds Backpack Hunting Shed Antler Hunting Gravelly Mtns Elk Elk Statistics Antelope Advice Hunting Access
| |
Elk Hunting by the Numbers
Current population dynamics, success rates, and enough
other numbers to choke a statistician.
ince
youre reading this, chances are you take your hunting research seriously. Hunting
doesnt drop off your mental radar screen when the season ends, thats just when
you start plotting and scheming for next year. With that in mind, I think youll find
the following tables interesting. They're part of the Elk Plan Evaluation for Region
3 (southwest Montana, where the lions share of the best elk hunting in the state
takes place), and have the most recent figures currently available, updated as of
12/22/01.Before you get lost in the tables; a couple of noteworthy points; Note that
the current population estimates are within and in fact, mostly exceed the plan
objectives. Thats great, were sure not short of elk around here! Also, in many
units, elk numbers exceed hunter numbers. I dont think anyone will find fault with
that situation, either! Ill offer some more personal conclusions drawn from the
numbers later, but first; the figures
.
Remember, these are estimates, but the population figures are from aerial surveys, and all
are the most recent figures currently available (up-to-date as of 12/22/01). Also,
you might ask "What about the rest of the state?". I'll include some data
about other areas of the state later, but for the most part if you compare the management
units listed (most of which consist of several hunting districts) with the areas listed as
the best elk hunting areas in our Elk Hunting Review article,
you'll see these are about the best areas in the state to kill a bull on public land, with
no special permits required (except, of course, the Elkhorns).
Elk
Management
Unit |
Elk Population |
Hunter Numbers |
Elk Harvest |
Success
Rate** |
Current
Estimate |
Objective |
| Gravelly |
9100 |
8000-8500 |
13199 |
2092 |
15.8% |
| Fleecer |
2063 |
1500-1800 |
2826 |
384 |
13.6% |
| Madison |
7900 |
N/A * |
5649 |
992 |
17.6% |
| Pioneer |
3565 |
2700-3200 |
6604 |
1239 |
18.8% |
| Tobacco Root |
1300 |
900-1000 |
2478 |
336 |
13.6% |
| Tendoy |
2869 |
1800-2300 |
3521 |
841 |
23.9% |
| Elkhorn |
2072 |
1900-2100 |
3794 |
649 |
17.1% |
| Granite Butte |
2278 |
1800-2200 |
4318 |
645 |
14.9% |
| Bridger |
3794 |
2300-2600 |
4132 |
890 |
21.5% |
| Emigrant |
6000 |
5000-6000 |
3803 |
1216 |
40% |
| Gallatin |
4492 |
3600-3800 |
5627 |
871 |
15.5% |
| Highland |
1371 |
1500-1700 |
3620 |
465 |
12.8% |
| Deer Lodge |
1969 |
1900-2000 |
4284 |
645 |
15.1% |
* Based on landowner tolerance, which is increasing due to
changes in land ownership which no longer emphasize cattle production.
** Overall success rate, antlered and antlerless elk.
| Elk Management Unit |
Bull/Cow
Ratio* |
Calf/Cow
Ratio* |
% Branch Antlered Bulls Harvested |
% Six-Point Bulls |
% of Bulls Harvested the First Week |
| Gravelly |
N/A |
26 |
95 |
22 |
59 |
| Fleecer |
13-18 |
29 |
100 |
24-40 |
23-44 |
| Madison |
26 |
31 |
49 |
44 |
20 |
| Pioneer |
7-18 |
26-38 |
39-52 |
8-14 |
29-52 |
| Tobacco Root |
N/A |
36 |
100 |
N/A |
43 |
| Tendoy |
6-12 |
29-31 |
41-74 |
13-20 |
66-70 |
| Elkhorn |
11 |
N/A |
10-15 |
N/A |
N/A |
| Granite Butte |
13 |
31 |
72 |
15 |
68 |
| Bridger |
20.7 |
27.3 |
92.1 |
26.4 |
22.3 |
| Emigrant |
15-60 |
15-30 |
93 |
68 |
2-26 |
| Gallatin |
19 |
18 |
58 |
41 |
22 |
| Highland |
11-14 |
22-26 |
99 |
20-36 |
33-46 |
| Deer Lodge |
13 |
40 |
93.6 |
24 |
48.7 |
* per 100 cows
|
Conclusions and Review by Unit
Gravelly- Lots of elk, lots of hunters, lots of elk
killed. Percentage of six-point bulls harvested isn't that great, but I'm somewhat
surprised it's as high as it is. See our article on the Gravelly-Snowcrest herd.
According to fourteen years of research, trophy-class, seven plus year old bulls
account for less than 1% of the population, so if 22% of the bulls harvested are indeed
six-points, I'd say a lot of them are in the 250-280 class, largely four and a half
year-olds.. First-week harvest is high, exceeded only by the Tendoys, which
corroborates the data in the aforementioned article. Biologists use the first-week
harvest rates as a measure of the degree of security in the area, although it can indicate
a couple of different things. In the Tendoys, for instance, first-week success
accounts for a high percentage because the elk tend to move onto private land generally
inaccessible to hunters as the season progresses. In the Gravellies, though, the
high percentage indicates an overall lack of secure cover. Either way, in those
areas you probably want to think about hunting early.
Fleecer- Kind of a sleeper area. Lesser numbers
overall than the more popular elk hunting areas, except for the percentage of six-point
bulls killed. In most areas, hunter numbers and elk harvest are above FWP Elk Plan
objectives, but in the Fleecer area both are below. One statistic I didn't include
in the tables, due to lack of space and because it is occasionally misleading, is the
number of recreation days per elk harvested. In the Fleecer area, this is highest of
the units mentioned at 55. Taken together, these three statistics reinforce what I
know of the area from a non-mathematical standpoint; it's kind of a tough area to hunt,
but trophy potential is pretty good.
Madison- Second only to the Gravellies in elk and
hunter numbers, and fourth in elk harvest, this is a great area. It ranks at or near
the top in bull/cow ratios, calf production, and percent of six-point bulls taken (with
more of those bulls in the 300+ class). One odd thing is the percentage of
branch antlered bulls in the harvest at 49%. I suspect that number is skewed by the
late cow season along the west face of the Madison Range. Although it's occurring in
other parts of the state as well, one bright spot for the Madison herd is changes in land
ownership and use patterns on land adjoining the winter range that have reduced or
eliminated emphasis on cattle production, and created large de facto game preserves.
While it can be argued that hunting opportunity is reduced to non-existent on those
ranches, that has largely been the case for a long time, and besides, the elk summer on
public land. The trick is to catch them before or while they're migrating to winter
on private land.
Pioneer- Once again, except for the Gravellies (which
should possibly be in a category by themselves) the Pioneers have the highest elk harvest,
exceeding even the Emigrant unit with its late cow hunt. What's more surprising is
that this high harvest comes from a herd numbering only slightly more than half the
Emigrant herd. Like the Gravellies, this is possibly not the best place to look for
a giant bull, but if you'd rather shoot an elk than go home empty-handed they're good
places to go.
Tobacco Root- You'll probably want to pass on this
one...For reasons that no one seems to agree on, the Tobacco Roots just don't produce.
They've been under a 4-point restriction for mule deer for a number of years, and
you'd think they would produce good mulies, but they just don't. Same with elk, and
they pretty much trail the pack in all categories of these statistics. Not a bad
place to put in for a mountain goat tag, though...
Tendoy- This area has the lowest number of recreation
days per elk harvested, with 20. The thing is, a lot of them are cows, and the bulk
are taken the first week. As previously mentioned, the elk tend to move onto private
land as the season goes on. The percentage of six-point bulls harvested is near the
bottom of the pack and so, moving right along...
Elkhorn- The Elkhorns are a trophy permit area, and as
of last year you had about a 1 in 34 chance of drawing. Otherwise, you're limited to
spikes, unless you draw one of the fairly abundant cow tags. That's why six-point
bulls account for such a low percentage of the bulls taken in this district. If you
draw the tag, you might get a real trophy. Then again, you might not...I know a guy
who had an Elkhorn either-sex tag in 2000. He saw plenty of decent bulls, but was
holding out for a real bruiser. Then, at the end, luck utterly failed him, and he
wound up shooting a cow the last week. Bummer....Ordinarily, though, if you draw an
Elkhorn bull tag, you'd better have some taxidermy money budgeted.
Granite Butte- The name of this unit will probably
cause some confusion. It consists of Hunting Districts 284, 293, 339, and 343, which
lie on both sides of the continental divide from Rogers and Flesher passes south to
McDonald Pass. Based solely on the numbers, there's nothing to cause my pulse to
race....I do know some good bulls come out of here, though nothing like areas like the
Madison Range or Emigrant. It's a big area, and overall I'd say the elk hunting is
nothing exceptional, but in areas like that there's always pockets of superior habitat,
usually the thickest, steepest hell-holes you can find. If you know of a spot like
that, don't tell anybody about it, and you may find the overall numbers aren't really
applicable to you. But if you're unfamiliar with Montana elk hunting and looking for
somewhere to start, this wouldn't be my choice...
Bridger- Some good numbers here, including the lowest
recreation days per elk harvested ratio (22), except for Emigrant, which I'll explain
momentarily. For that matter, there aren't any unfavorable numbers for the Bridger
unit. One caution, though...while there's a lot of public land in the Bridger
Mountains, the surrounding private lands that are also part of the management unit contain
the best trophy potential. Outfitted hunts in the north portion of the unit are
producing some superb bulls, although a few people nail wall-hangers on the public land
every year also. Either way, this unit is on the short list.
Emigrant- Big numbers throughout, and at a glance you'd
think "Wow, that's the place". Well, it can be, but....The problem is it's
largely a feast or famine situation. It's prime winter range for the northern
Yellowstone herd, but if weather hasn't pushed them into the area yet, elk can be very few
& far between. When the weather gets tough during the general season, though, or
if you draw one of the highly sought-after late season bull tags, you can be in fat city.
I know of a guy who just last week (1/15/01) killed an extraordinary 372 bull up
there. The late cow season is the primary reason for the exceptional 40% success
rate, if it were restricted to general season success, especially with the mild conditions
we've had the past several falls, that number would be way lower, and possibly toward the
bottom of the pack. If you can be flexible with your hunting plans, and manage to
have your Emigrant hunt coincide with or follow a period of nasty weather, you might
connect on one of those big Park bulls, with comparatively minimal effort. Plan on
having some competition, though.
Gallatin- another prime area that also makes the short
list. Things are changing up the Gallatin, though, and we're going to be keeping a
close eye on it. The scary number is the cow/calf ratio; at 18 calves/100 cows, it's
the lowest of the units under discussion. High numbers of lions, wolves, and bears
are taking a toll. Other areas are experiencing this also, but it arguably seems to
be having the most rapid impact in this area. After so many mild winters, when this
past fall started off wintry people were expecting slammer elk hunting up the
Gallatin, and for the most part, it didn't materialize. In fact, hunting wasn't all
that great in a lot of formerly outstanding areas. Migration and seasonal use patterns
appear to be changing, and what worked in the past might not anymore. The jury is
still out, and one season doesn't constitute a trend, but the situation bears watching (no
pun intended).
Highland- this area south of Butte is a popular hunting
destination, with nearly as many recreation days as the Gallatin, which supports over
three times the elk population. Considering that, the numbers hold up pretty well,
though, except success rate which is struggling at the rear of the pack. Recreation
days per elk harvested are right up there with the Fleecer unit, at 54. Overall, the
numbers are typical of a fairly heavily hunted, relatively accessible area. If you
have a hotspot, or live close by; great, but if you're looking for someplace new to hunt,
I'd probably pass on this one...
Deer Lodge- the bright spot here is the cow/calf ratio,
which comes in highest at 40/100. Otherwise the numbers are proportionally similar
to the Highlands, although the success rate is better at 15.1%. Still, that's not
enough to make me want to pack up and move my elk hunting to Deer Lodge. I'm sure
you could find local residents who would disagree, and more power to 'em.
Just for comparison purposes, here's some numbers from other units around
the state. I've left out quite a number of units, simply because the elk numbers are
quite low, and/or hunting opportunities are limited due to lack of access. Again,
these numbers support the conclusions drawn in our Elk Hunting Review article, but study
'em and come to your own conclusions. Note; population and harvest numbers are
generally not as up-to-date as the preceding tables, although they're representative and I
don't expect any major changes for this past season. |
Elk Management
Unit |
Population |
Harvest |
Hunter
Numbers |
Success
Rate |
| Bob Marshall |
4676 |
1460 |
12218 |
11.9% |
| Bitterroot |
830 |
174 |
1895 |
9.2% |
| Rock Creek |
2221 |
782 |
4401 |
17.8% |
| Big Belt |
1600-1800 |
550-650 |
2600-3000 |
21% |
| Little Belt |
3700 |
1300 |
12000 |
10.8% |
| Absaroka |
1850 |
233 |
1684 |
13.8% |
| Crazy Mtns |
2191 |
563 |
2426 |
23% |
| Missouri Breaks |
5300 |
1293 |
4137 |
31% |
Overall, the figures from this table aren't quite as reliable as the preceding ones.
There isn't as much consistency in the way the data is collected; in some units
harvest numbers included both cows & bulls, in others it's just bulls, and some units
include archery hunters in the total and others don't. I feel the Missouri Breaks
success rate in particular is inflated, although rifle hunters (permit only) do enjoy high
success, archery hunters don't. Regardless of what these numbers say, I'll stand
with the conclusions drawn in our Elk Hunting Review article.So,
plug these figures into your elk hunting plans. If you've already got a favorite
area, they may confirm what you already know, and if you're looking for somewhere to hunt,
I'm certain you'll find them valuable. Remember, though, elk hunting is not an exact
science, and you can't put absolute faith in numbers. Trophy bulls are like gold,
they're where you find 'em, but if you do your homework your odds of hitting the jackpot
are greatly increased. Then, you just need a little luck, and that's one factor we
can't supply numbers for. We're hoping you get your share, though.... |
|